Symptom
The resource X has been maintained in the production order, and the resource is mapped to G/L account: AAA.
There is a service Y maintained in the master data of this resource X, and the service is mapped to G/L account: BBB.
In the journal entry of production order confirmation, for the resource line, see it's posted to G/L account: AAA.
(X represents the resource ID. Y represents the service ID.)
(AAA and BBB represent different G/L accounts.)
Environment
SAP Business ByDesign
Reproducing the Issue
- Go to General Ledger work center.
- Go to Journal Entries view.
- Search for the journal entry ID.
- See that the G/L account used is AAA.
- Why G/L account AAA is derived instead of BBB.
Cause
Although a service has been assigned to the related resource, there is no service maintained in the production confirmation document itself. If no service is involved in the document, then the G/L account is derived using the default entry in account determination for resource, which is G/L account AAA.
The journal entry derivation does not consider whether the a service has been assigned to a resource, instead it directly check whether the required service is used in the production confirmation or not. Only when the service itself appears in the production confirmation document, the related G/L account BBB will be considered in generating a journal entry.
Resolution
Assign a service to a resource and also to the production model. Then the G/L account BBB which is directly related to the service can be brought to the production order and production confirmation.
See Also
KBA 1917376- Unposted Production Confirmation - Default entry without acc. det. group: G/L account missing for services
Keywords
production confirmation, journal entry, G/L account, resource, service , KBA , SRD-FIN-GL , General Ledger , SRD-FIN-INV , Inventory , Problem
SAP Knowledge Base Article - Public