3536913 - The material procurement types are inconsistent in PP and master data CDS views.

Symptom

The procurement type is maintained as "X" in material master data.
Check in CDS view I_ProductPlantBasic, the ProcurementType parameter has the value "X".
Check in CDS view I_ManufacturingOrderItem, however, the MaterialProcurementType parameter has the value "E".

Environment

SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud

Cause

This is not a data inconsistency.
Actually, I_ProductPlantBasic-ProcurementType and I_ManufacturingOrderItem-MaterialProcurementType represent for different fields in the system due to the different naming rules in PP and master data.

Resolution

Below is a table regarding the corresponding Global Field Names (GFNs):

Data Element	Domain	Type of code	Description in backend	GFN used in PP CDS views	GFN used in material master CDS views
BESKZ	BESKZ	Fixed domain value	Procurement Type	MaterialProcurementCategory	ProcurementType
SOBSL	SOBSL	Customizable code	Special Procurement Type	MaterialProcurementProfile	ProcurementSubType
SOBES	SOBES	Fixed domain value	Special procurement indicator	MaterialProcurementType	--
ESOBS	ESOBS	Customizable code	Special Procurement - External	MaterialProcurementExtType	--

The real parameter represents for the procurement type in CDS view I_ManufacturingOrderItem is MaterialProcurementCategory.

Keywords

I_ProductPlantBasic, ProcurementType, I_ManufacturingOrderItem, MaterialProcurementType, production order, procurement type, data inconsistency, Global Field Names, GFNs , KBA , PP-VDM-2CL , Virtual Data Model in PP (Public Cloud) , Problem

Product

SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition all versions