SAP Knowledge Base Article - Preview

3741381 - HCM Payroll Results Archiving — FOR-Period vs. IN-Period Design and Recommendations

Symptom

When archiving HCM payroll results using archive object PA_CALC via transaction PU22, the standard system archives based on the FOR-period (the payroll period for which results were calculated). There is no option to archive based on the IN-period (the period in which payroll was actually processed).

You may want to archive payroll results by IN-period to retain more recent retroactive recalculation results in the database, even if their FOR-period falls within the archiving range.

Additionally, the following comment in class CL_HRPAY99_PAY_DIR_CU_CA may appear to suggest an enhancement option exists in SAP S/4HANA:

*     SEQNR check wrong in case of recalculations!
*     IPEND does not match in case of recalculations into new
*     CA entries. Keep in mind that for-periods are used to
*     decide which records are archived and the in-period does
*     not matter (classic PU22 behaviour!).
*     UT exists in S/4 code!

This may be interpreted as an indication that a BAdI, enhancement spot, or user exit exists to modify PU22 behavior to support IN-period archiving.


Read more...

Environment

  • Human Capital Management (HCM)
  • SAP R/3
  • SAP ERP Core Component
  • SAP ERP
  • SAP S/4HANA

Product

SAP ERP Central Component all versions ; SAP ERP all versions ; SAP S/4HANA all versions ; SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Payroll all versions ; SAP enhancement package for SAP ERP all versions

Keywords

PU22, PA_CALC, payroll archiving, FOR-period, IN-period, FPEND, IPEND, HCM archiving , KBA , PY-XX , Payroll: General Parts , Problem

About this page

This is a preview of a SAP Knowledge Base Article. Click more to access the full version on SAP for Me (Login required).

Search for additional results

Visit SAP Support Portal's SAP Notes and KBA Search.